Pursuing helps law firms review medical, injury, tort, and records heavy matters with structured preliminary expert assessment, case summaries, expert matching, and cross border case support.
When a matter turns on causation, injury consistency, treatment history, documentation gaps, or alternative explanations, your team should not have to start from a disorganized file. Pursuing organizes the record and routes the matter for focused expert review, fast.
Structured assessments covering causation, injury consistency, and documentation quality, returned as a clear summary your team can act on.
Matters are routed by specialty and complexity to reviewers suited to the case, with up to three independent assessments where useful.
Translation and coordination support for matters involving international records, parties, or counsel.
Tell us what your firm needs reviewed. Please do not submit confidential records through this public form.
Many matters need a first pass medical or technical read before a firm decides how much time to invest. Pursuing helps organize the review around the questions that matter most: what happened, what the records show, what is missing, and where the case may need deeper analysis.
Give your intake and case evaluation teams a clearer view of medical support before a matter moves deeper into review.
Support early assessment of injury claims, treatment history, documentation quality, and potential alternative explanations.
Use structured preliminary review to decide whether a matter needs deeper expert work, additional records, or a formal opinion.
The goal is simple: organize the facts, focus the expert review, and return a clear summary your team can use when deciding what should happen next.
Your firm provides the basic matter type, key dates, known injuries, disputed issues, and available records through a secure process.
Pursuing prepares a concise case snapshot, medical timeline, treatment summary, and issue list for review.
The matter is routed based on specialty, subject matter, complexity, and any required conflict or confidentiality checks.
The reviewer addresses defined categories such as causation, injury consistency, objective findings, and missing information.
Your team receives a structured preliminary summary that highlights strengths, concerns, gaps, and recommended next steps.
Preliminary review should not create more confusion. Pursuing organizes the assessment into consistent categories so your team can quickly understand what is supported, what is unclear, and what requires deeper work.
Every preliminary review follows the same one screen structure, so experts spend their time on judgment, not navigation, and your team gets outputs that are consistent across cases and reviewers.
Injury type, alleged event, key dates, and the 3 to 5 disputed issues that matter most, so the reviewer orients instantly without reading the full file first.
A compact strip showing incident date, first treatment, imaging, surgeries, and gaps in care, pulled from the record so the chronology is visible at a glance.
Locked, click fast categories cover causation, injury consistency, objective findings, documentation completeness, alternative explanations, and red flags. No typing required for the core assessment.
A short narrative field captures the reasoning in plain medical terms, paired with a separate field for missing information needed for a full opinion, which often determines retention later.
A confidence level and time to review are captured automatically, giving your team context for how much weight to give each assessment, especially when multiple reviewers are involved.
Each case can route to up to three independent reviewers. When multiple assessments come in, your dashboard shows consensus indicators, points of agreement or disagreement, and any flagged issues that need deeper analysis before the matter advances toward a formal expert engagement.
When a matter involves records, parties, witnesses, or counsel across jurisdictions, Pursuing helps coordinate legal and medical document translation and connects firms with local attorney networks so international materials can be evaluated with confidence.
Translation and case summary support for matters involving EU based records, correspondence, parties, or counsel, with attorney network coordination where needed.
Support for matters touching UK and Irish records or contacts, including education and tort related matters that involve schools, institutions, or local counsel.
Document translation and matter summary support for cases involving Spanish or Portuguese language records and cross border parties.
For matters involving other regions, Pursuing can help scope translation needs, identify local resources, and structure the review around the languages and jurisdictions involved.
Cross border document handling is structured to respect the privacy and data protection rules of the relevant jurisdiction, including GDPR for matters involving EU based records.
Pursuing gives medical experts a low commitment way to review real matters, contribute early stage insight, and build a track record that firms can see when they are evaluating who to retain for formal expert witness work.
Browse a queue of cases filtered by your specialty and relevance. Each review takes roughly 5 to 20 minutes using a guided, click fast format.
Every submission is time stamped and tied to your profile. Consistent, well reasoned reviews help firms identify you for deeper engagement.
Strong preliminary reviews can lead directly to formal expert witness engagements, with scheduling, conflict checks, and secure communication handled through the platform.
Pursuing Litigation Support is designed for matters where early organization, medical review, expert matching, or international coordination can help the firm decide what to do next.
Assess claimed injuries, treatment timelines, objective findings, gaps in care, and causation questions before deeper case investment.
Bring consistency to large matter review by standardizing the case snapshot, records summary, and preliminary issue checklist.
Turn lengthy records into a focused review package that highlights chronology, supporting documentation, missing items, and disputed facts.
Support early review of medical support, alternative causes, documentation issues, and facts that may require additional investigation.
Identify the right type of expert for a matter based on specialty, records, claimed injury, and the questions your team needs answered.
Give in house claims teams a structured first read on incoming matters before deciding how much outside counsel involvement is warranted.
Support for matters involving schools, institutions, or education related claims that require structured early review and documentation organization.
Coordinate translation and summary support for cross border records, correspondence, and matter documents.
Whether your firm needs preliminary medical review, expert matching, records organization, or international case support, Pursuing can help structure the next step before the matter requires a full formal engagement.
Request Litigation Support →Pursuing Litigation Support is intended for preliminary case screening, records organization, expert coordination, and translation support. Public website submissions should not include confidential case documents, protected medical information, privileged materials, or sensitive records. Formal legal, medical, or expert opinions require appropriate engagement, authorization, conflict review, and secure document handling.